You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 282 No. 3, July 21, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Spinal Manipulation for Tension-type Headache

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: As an osteopathic family physician who incorporates osteopathic manipulation therapy (OMT) into my daily practice, I was concerned by the design and conclusions of the article by Drs Bove and Nilsson.1 The article should lead one to conclude only that the particular method of manipulation used was not helpful.

Before dismissing the role of manipulation from the therapeutic armamentarium for headaches, it is important to look more closely at other relevant factors. First, OMT is consistently more comprehensive than the treatment described in this study (techniques were confined to the cervical spine and musculature surrounding the cervical and upper thoracic spine). Holistic therapy mandates that one treats the whole body, not just the affected part. By so doing, OMT is often successful in reducing symptoms, improving outcomes, decreasing direct and indirect costs (such as physician office visits), as well as decreasing the frequency of treatments.2

Finally, the . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.