You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 282 No. 4, July 28, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Dermatology
 •Dermatologic Disorders
 •Herpes
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Herpes Simplex Virus Vaccines— Why Don't Antibodies Protect?

John R. Mascola, MD

JAMA. 1999;282:379-380.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Most effective viral vaccines work, at least in part, by inducing antibodies capable of neutralizing the invading virus.1-3 Examples among licensed human vaccines include measles, polio, rabies, influenza, hepatitis A, and hepatitis B vaccines.4-6 Even for diseases such as chickenpox, in which cellular immunity is thought to control disease, administration of specific antibody (eg, varicella-zoster immune globulin) can protect against disease when administered up to 96 hours following viral exposure.7 Therefore, the report by Corey and colleagues in this issue of THE JOURNAL8 is perhaps surprising because a herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) vaccine that induced high levels of neutralizing antibodies did not protect against HSV-2 infection. The possible reasons for the apparent failure of this vaccine highlight the empirical nature of vaccine science, the limitations of preclinical and animal model studies, and the need for well-designed human efficacy trials.

Herpes simplex virus type 1 . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: Division of Retrovirology, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Rockville, Md.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Recombinant Glycoprotein Vaccine for the Prevention of Genital HSV-2 Infection: Two Randomized Controlled Trials
Lawrence Corey, Andria G. M. Langenberg, Rhoda Ashley, Rose E. Sekulovich, Allen E. Izu, John M. Douglas, Jr, H. Hunter Handsfield, Terri Warren, Lisa Marr, Stephen Tyring, Richard DiCarlo, Adaora A. Adimora, Peter Leone, Cornelia L. Dekker, Rae Lyn Burke, Wai Ping Leong, Stephen E. Straus, and for the Chiron HSV Vaccine Study Group
JAMA. 1999;282(4):331-340.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Immunologic Strategies for Herpes Vaccination
Friedman et al.
JAMA 2000;283:746-746.
FULL TEXT  

In Vivo Role of Complement-Interacting Domains of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Glycoprotein Gc
Lubinski et al.
JEM 1999;190:1637-1646.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Herpes Vaccine Still Elusive
JWatch General 1999;1999:1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.