You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 283 No. 11, March 15, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Sources of Bias in the Economic Analysis of New Drugs

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Mr Friedberg and colleagues1 found that studies sponsored by drug companies were less likely to report unfavorable results than studies funded by nonprofit organizations. The authors posited several alternative explanations for their findings, including publication bias, unconscious bias because of relationships between the investigator and the pharmaceutical company, early screening of studies by drug firms, and direct company involvement with the study design.

As noted in the accompanying editorial,2 the conflict of interest hypothesis would be strengthened by a study design comparing several economic evaluations, from different funding sources, of a single agent. However, the design of the study by Friedberg et al allows alternative explanations to be considered. First, many pharmaceutical companies conduct internal economic evaluations throughout the development of a drug product. Because reimbursement for a drug product is often dependent on positive economic findings,3 otherwise promising products may be terminated during development by the . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Evaluation of Conflict of Interest in Economic Analyses of New Drugs Used in Oncology
Mark Friedberg, Bernard Saffran, Tammy J. Stinson, Wendy Nelson, and Charles L. Bennett
JAMA. 1999;282(15):1453-1457.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Quantitative analysis of sponsorship bias in economic studies of antidepressants
Baker et al.
Br. J. Psychiatry 2003;183:498-506.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pharmacoeconomic Analyses: Making Them Transparent, Making Them Credible
Rennie and Luft
JAMA 2000;283:2158-2160.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.