You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 283 No. 14, April 12, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Fidelity and Deceit at the Bedside

M. Gregg Bloche, MD, JD

JAMA. 2000;283:1881-1884.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To what extent should physicians act as their patients' advocates in the struggle to gain access to health care resources? Neither the Hippocratic ethical tradition nor contemporary bioethics nor US law speak clearly to this question.1

The physician who recites the Hippocratic Oath pledges, "I will prescribe regimen for the good of my patients according to my ability and my judgment. . . ."2 But the oath says nothing about what, if anything, its adherents should do to secure their patients' access to the "regimen" so prescribed. The dominant stream in contemporary bioethics subsumes professional obligation under 4 principles—respect for autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice.3 Fidelity to patients and advocacy on their behalf are derived from respect for autonomy and, thus, treated as taking their content, case by case, from patients' legitimate expectations. This, of course, begs the question of what expectations are "legitimate" when . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: Georgetown/Johns Hopkins University Program in Law and Public Health, Washington, DC.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Physician Manipulation of Reimbursement Rules for Patients: Between a Rock and a Hard Place
Matthew K. Wynia, Deborah S. Cummins, Jonathan B. VanGeest, and Ira B. Wilson
JAMA. 2000;283(14):1858-1865.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.