This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (6)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants play an important role in the careers of the research faculty in medical schools. Given the importance of NIH funding in an academic career, we sought to determine several aspects of NIH funding that have, to the best of our knowledge, not been examined in detail. These are (1) the median length of time of NIH funding during the academic life of an individual, (2) the predictive value, for long-term funding, of receiving NIH funding at any given time, and (3) the effect of length of the unfunded period on the likelihood that an investigator will be subsequently funded.

Methods

We obtained the funding histories of individuals who were awarded any NIH grants in the index years 1972 and 1982, and tracked individual funding histories for 25 years and 15 years, respectively. Data consisted of the number of grants each individual received . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Clinical Revenue Investment in Biomedical Research: Lessons From Two Academic Medical Centers
Bowman et al.
JAMA 2007;297:2521-2524.
FULL TEXT  

Evidence- and Consensus-Based Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Fass et al.
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:2081-2088.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT