You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 283 No. 18, May 10, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

How Should Physicians Involve Patients in Medical Decisions?

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Braddock and colleagues1 found that 91% of patient-physician interactions failed to meet their definition of informed decision making. However, this snapshot approach ignores the context of the patient-physician relationship. Every intervention is negotiated with each patient, and both sides have expectations based on prior interactions, which lay the groundwork for a productive relationship. Each interaction, however, must stand on its own merits. If we fail the patient's expectations this time, next time we have to rebuild or the patient will need to start over somewhere else. Patients become comfortable with a relationship, which varies in its paternalism or autonomy depending on the decision at hand. Trust, therefore, is earned. Without it we have to go through a cumbersome decision framework bit by bit, warily sparring back and forth until there is a comfort level of trust.

Peter J. Gates, MD
Ledyard, Conn

1. Braddock III CH, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TM, Levinson W. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA. 1999;282:2313-2320. FREE FULL TEXT


To the Editor: The . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Informed Decision Making in Outpatient Practice: Time to Get Back to Basics
Clarence H. Braddock III, Kelly A. Edwards, Nicole M. Hasenberg, Tracy L. Laidley, and Wendy Levinson
JAMA. 1999;282(24):2313-2320.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Women's Decision-Making Roles Regarding Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy
Nekhlyudov et al.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2005;2005:55-60.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.