 |
 |

How Should Physicians Involve Patients in Medical Decisions?
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: Dr Braddock and colleagues1 found that 91% of patient-physician interactions failed to meet their definition of informed decision making. However, this snapshot approach ignores the context of the patient-physician relationship. Every intervention is negotiated with each patient, and both sides have expectations based on prior interactions, which lay the groundwork for a productive relationship. Each interaction, however, must stand on its own merits. If we fail the patient's expectations this time, next time we have to rebuild or the patient will need to start over somewhere else. Patients become comfortable with a relationship, which varies in its paternalism or autonomy depending on the decision at hand. Trust, therefore, is earned. Without it we have to go through a cumbersome decision framework bit by bit, warily sparring back and forth until there is a comfort level of trust.
Peter J. Gates, MD
Ledyard, Conn
1. Braddock III CH, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TM, Levinson W. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA. 1999;282:2313-2320.
FREE FULL TEXT
To the Editor: The . . . [Full Text of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Informed Decision Making in Outpatient Practice: Time to Get Back to Basics
Clarence H. Braddock III, Kelly A. Edwards, Nicole M. Hasenberg, Tracy L. Laidley, and Wendy Levinson
JAMA. 1999;282(24):2313-2320.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Women's Decision-Making Roles Regarding Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy
Nekhlyudov et al.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2005;2005:55-60.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|