You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 283 No. 19, May 17, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Health Agencies Update
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

An Unkind Cut?

Joan Stephenson, PhD

JAMA. 2000;283:2514.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 141 words of the full text and any section headings.

Nearly one of four of cesarean deliveries performed for "lack of progress in labor" may be carried out too early during the birth process, according to a new study funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Researchers found that up to 24% of the 294,000 cesarean deliveries performed annually in the United States for lack of progress were in women with a dilation of only 0 to 3 cm. This practice is contrary to the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology's recommendation that the cervix be dilated to 4 cm or more before a diagnosis of lack of progress of labor.

The researchers suggested that physicians may be less comfortable with risks associated with abnormal labor than with those associated with cesarean deliveries. The study appeared in the April 1 issue of Obstetrics and Gynecology.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.