You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 283 No. 19, May 17, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Use of the Pulmonary Artery Catheter in Critically Ill Patients

Was Invention the Mother of Necessity?

Jesse B. Hall, MD

JAMA. 2000;283:2577-2578.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

It has been more than 4 years since Dalen and Bone1 called for either a moratorium on the use of pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) for the management of critically ill patients or randomized clinical trials to demonstrate their benefit. Their recommendation was in response to a retrospective observational analysis by Connors et al2 that reported increased mortality and cost in diverse patient groups monitored with the PAC.

Debate concerning the clinical significance of this and earlier studies rekindled and continues, taking place in medical journals, at meetings of professional societies, and in the minds of practicing intensivists. There are several issues related to the study reported by Connors et al2 in 1996 that, in the aggregate, persuaded many that justification for an immediate moratorium on the PAC did not exist. First, since patients in that study were not randomized to management with and without a PAC, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill.


RELATED ARTICLES

Patient Characteristics and ICU Organizational Factors That Influence Frequency of Pulmonary Artery Catheterization
John Rapoport, Daniel Teres, Jay Steingrub, Thomas Higgins, William McGee, and Stanley Lemeshow
JAMA. 2000;283(19):2559-2567.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pulmonary Artery Catheterization and Clinical Outcomes: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and Food and Drug Administration Workshop Report
Gordon R. Bernard, George Sopko, Frank Cerra, Robert Demling, Henry Edmunds, Samuel Kaplan, Larry Kessler, Henry Masur, Polly Parsons, Deborah Shure, Carol Webb, Herbert Wiedemann, Gail Weinmann, and David Williams
JAMA. 2000;283(19):2568-2572.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Searching for Evidence to Support Pulmonary Artery Catheter Use in Critically Ill Patients
Hall
JAMA 2005;294:1693-1694.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical Use Of Medical Devices In The 'Bermuda Triangle'
Kessler et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2004;23:200-207.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Dose of Our Own Medicine: Alternative Medicine, Conventional Medicine, and the Standards of Science
Morreim
J Law Med Ethics 2003;31:222-235.
 

Do Critically Ill Patients Benefit From Use of Pulmonary Artery Catheters?
Kaufman and Hall
JAMA 2000;284:1242-1242.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.