You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 283 No. 24, June 28, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Informed Decisions for Extremely Low-Birth-Weight Infants

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Saigal and colleagues1 found that parents of teenagers who had been extremely low-birth-weight (ELBW) infants gave higher quality-of-life scores to hypothetical scenarios of disability than did health care professionals. The authors conclude that parents are willing to accept life-sustaining care for extremely premature infants, despite the likelihood of severe disability. They further suggest that neonatal caregivers are less willing to provide such care and may influence parents to decline intensive treatment.

This is the opposite of our own experiences. As parents of extremely premature infants, we were given little information about probable outcomes and few, if any, choices about the treatment. Instead of being encouraged to limit care, many of us were threatened and made to feel like criminals for questioning even the most extreme medical measures. We are aware that experienced neonatal caregivers may be reluctant to have their own ELBW infants resuscitated and treated;2 . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Differences in Preferences for Neonatal Outcomes Among Health Care Professionals, Parents, and Adolescents
, , , , , , and
JAMA. ;281():1991-1997.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Attitudes Toward Neonatal Intensive Care Treatment of Preterm Infants With a High Risk of Developing Long-term Disabilities
Lam et al.
Pediatrics 2009;123:1501-1508.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The corporate transformation of medical specialty care: the exemplary case of neonatology.
Kinney
J Law Med Ethics 2008;36:790-802.
 

International Comparison of Care for Very Low Birth Weight Infants: Parents' Perceptions of Counseling and Decision-Making
Partridge et al.
Pediatrics 2005;116:e263-e271.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Withdrawing Nutrition and Hydration from Children: Legal, Ethical, and Professional Issues
Levi
CLIN PEDIATR 2003;42:139-145.
 

Restraining the Unsustainable
Silverman
Pediatrics 2003;111:672-674.
FULL TEXT  

Ethical Conflicts Between Residents and Attending Physicians
Levi
CLIN PEDIATR 2002;41:659-667.
ABSTRACT  

Attitudes of Parents and Health Care Professionals Toward Active Treatment of Extremely Premature Infants
Streiner et al.
Pediatrics 2001;108:152-157.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.