 |
 |

Accurate Ascertainment of Child-Abuse Mortality
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: The article by Dr Herman-Giddens and colleagues1 contributes to the literature on the scope of the child abuse problem by providing an estimate of underreporting in vital statistics. Similar studies2 provide estimates of reliability for other causes of death.
Two reasons account for differences in estimates of child abuse deaths between the vital statistics system and those of the authors' comprehensive case fatality review: (1) the availability of information on circumstances of the death and (2) definitional differences. Herman-Giddens et al reviewed a broad range of information from which child abuse could be inferred, including medical examiners' reports, autopsy reports, toxicology reports, and case notes. In contrast, ascertainment of child abuse in vital statistics depends entirely on the cause of death reported by the medical examiner, coroner, or attending physician. This is the only information available to the mortality medical coder to make judgments or inferences about . . . [Full Text of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Underascertainment of Child Abuse Mortality in the United States
Marcia E. Herman-Giddens, Gail Brown, Sarah Verbiest, Pamela J. Carlson, Elizabeth G. Hooten, Eleanor Howell, and John D. Butts
JAMA. 1999;282(5):463-467.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Child Injury Deaths: Comparing Prevention Information from Two Coding Systems
Schnitzer and Ewigman
J Pediatr Psychol 2005;30:413-423.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Underreporting of Justifiable Homicides Committed by Police Officers in the United States, 1976-1998
Loftin et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2003;93:1117-1121.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|