You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 283 No. 4, January 26, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Central Venous Catheters and Bloodstream Infection

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In their meta-analysis, Dr Veenstra and colleagues1 concluded that catheters coated with a combination of chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine (CSS) appear to be effective in reducing the incidence of both catheter colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection in patients at high risk for catheter-related infection. However, the individual trials do not provide strong evidence of efficacy overall. The largest clinical trial, performed by Logghe et al,2 was excluded because of the definition of catheter-related bacteremia. In this study, catheter-related bacteremia was defined as blood from the catheter containing at least 5 times as many colony forming units as peripheral blood. When the central venous catheter cannot be removed, the method appears adequate for the diagnosis of catheter-related bacteremia and has been reported to have 77.8% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and a global accuracy of 91.7%.3 In this study, a total of 680 catheters were inserted in patients with hematologic . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Efficacy of Antiseptic-Impregnated Central Venous Catheters in Preventing Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection: A Meta-analysis
, , , , and
JAMA. ;281():261-267.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Reduced colonization and infection with miconazole-rifampicin modified central venous catheters: a randomized controlled clinical trial
Yucel et al.
J Antimicrob Chemother 2004;54:1109-1115.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.