 |
|
Effectiveness of a Journal Intervention to Improve Abstract Quality
|
|
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
|
|
To the Editor: In a study of 6 large general medical journals, including JAMA, we found 18% to 68% of abstracts had either inconsistencies in data between the abstract and the body of the article or data given in the abstract that could not be found in the body of the article at all.1 In response, JAMA introduced a quality improvement initiative, effective January 1, 1998, to improve the quality of its abstracts.2 We assessed the effectiveness of the initiative using a masked analysis of samples from before and after the intervention.
Methods
We studied the first 50 articles identified as "Original Contributions" in JAMA volume 278 (July 2, 1997, through October 8, 1997) and the last 50 Original Contributions published in JAMA volume 280 (September 23/30, 1998, through December 23/30, 1998). The 100 articles chosen had all identifications of date, volume, and page number masked and were numbered according . . . [Full Text of this Article]
RELATED ARTICLE
Accuracy of Data in Abstracts of Published Research Articles
Roy M. Pitkin, Mary Ann Branagan, and Leon F. Burmeister
JAMA. 1999;281(12):1110-1111.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration
Boutron et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:295-309.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Quality of Abstracts of Papers Reporting Original Cost-Effectiveness Analyses
Rosen et al.
Med Decis Making 2005;25:424-428.
ABSTRACT
Quality of Abstracts in 3 Clinical Dermatology Journals
Dupuy et al.
Arch Dermatol 2003;139:589-593.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Chapter 6: From Review to Publication
Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:81-99.
FULL TEXT
Are structured abstracts more or less accurate than traditional ones? A study in the psychological literature
Hartley
Journal of Information Science 2000;26:273-277.
ABSTRACT
|
