You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 283 No. 8, February 23, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Controversies
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Withdrawing Very Low–Burden Interventions in Chronically Ill Patients

Jill A. Rhymes, MD; Laurence B. McCullough, PhD; Robert J. Luchi, MD; Thomas A. Teasdale, DrPH; Nancy Wilson, MA

JAMA. 2000;283:1061-1063.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Discussions of withdrawing or withholding treatment from patients have focused, for the most part, on critical care management of gravely ill patients or those with advanced or end-stage disease. In this article, we address the distinctive ethical issues that arise when the physician considers withdrawing low-burden clinical management from chronically—but not critically—ill patients.

Case Report

Reverend G is an 85-year-old white man with severe dementia. Except for dementia, he is in fairly good physical health. He had a pacemaker implanted several years previously. He has marked behavioral problems, including combativeness and physical aggression, and no longer recognizes his family members. He now resides in a nursing home in a locked dementia unit. Multiple trials of neuroleptics (typical and atypical), trazodone, and sedatives have failed to control his hallucinations and aggressive behavior and/or caused . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Huffington Center on Aging (Drs Rhymes, McCullough, Luchi, Teasdale, and Ms Wilson) and Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy (Dr McCullough), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Decisions to Withdraw Life-Sustaining Treatment: A Moral Algorithm
Edmund D. Pellegrino
JAMA. 2000;283(8):1065-1067.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Should implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and permanent pacemakers in patients with terminal illness be deactivated?: Patient Autonomy Is Paramount
Zellner et al.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2009;2:340-344.
FULL TEXT  

Medical and Ethical Aspects of Long-term Enteral Tube Feeding
McMahon et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80:1461-1476.
ABSTRACT  

Pacemaker and defibrillator deactivation in competent hospice patients: An ethical consideration
Ballentine
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 2005;22:14-19.
ABSTRACT  

Ethical Issues in Geriatrics: A Guide for Clinicians
Mueller et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79:554-562.
ABSTRACT  

Is It Ethical to Withdraw Low-Burden Interventions in Chronically Ill Patients?
Paola et al.
JAMA 2000;284:1380-1382.
FULL TEXT  

Treating Nondementia Illnesses in Patients With Dementia
Brauner et al.
JAMA 2000;283:3230-3235.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.