You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 284 No. 10, September 13, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Education
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Specialization and the Physician Workforce

Drivers and Determinants

Jeremiah A. Barondess, MD

JAMA. 2000;284:1299-1301.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Specialization in medicine has been a virtually inexorable trend for many years. In the modern era it was heralded by the progressive separation from general practice of obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics, internal medicine and surgery, and the surgical subspecialties. These movements began shortly after the turn of the century. The first US specialty board, in ophthalmology, was established in 1917, followed shortly by a dozen other specialties, including the American Board of Internal Medicine in 1936 and the American Board of Surgery a year later. The American Board of Medical Specialties added its 24th member board, the American Board of Medical Genetics, in 1991.

The growth of specialism and, more recently, subspecialism, has been, naturally enough, embraced by physicians seeking special expertise in various fields and recognition as well. Impetus has been added by status considerations, higher incomes earned by subspecialists, and the emerging need for . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: New York Academy of Medicine, New York, NY.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Generalist vs Specialist Medical Care
Dirk K. Greineder and Jeremiah A. Barondess
JAMA. 2000;284(22):2873-2874.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Growth of Specialization in Graduate Medical Education
Fred G. Donini-Lenhoff and Hannah L. Hedrick
JAMA. 2000;284(10):1284-1289.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Working group 3: How to encourage more minorities to choose a career in cardiology
Francis et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:241-245.
FULL TEXT  

Correlates of Use of Specialty Care
Kuhlthau et al.
Pediatrics 2004;113:e249-255.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Generalist vs Specialist Medical Care
Greineder and Barondess
JAMA 2000;284:2873-2874.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.