You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 284 No. 14, October 11, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Men's Health
 •Men's Health, Other
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Stent Scrutiny

A. Michael Lincoff, MD

JAMA. 2000;284:1839-1841.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Since the inception of balloon angioplasty in the early 1980s, the field of interventional cardiology has enjoyed explosive growth. It is estimated that more than 1.3 million percutaneous coronary revascularization procedures were performed worldwide in 1999, considerably more than the approximately 700,000 coronary artery bypass graft operations.1 Important limitations of balloon angioplasty, however, include the risk of uncontrolled plaque disruption, leading to periprocedural coronary occlusion and myocardial infarction, and a 20% to 40% incidence of recurrent narrowing (restenosis) during the 6 to 12 months following successful revascularization.2 A variety of new technologies have been developed to overcome these limitations, the most successful of which has been the coronary stent.

A stent is a coil-like metal scaffold implanted within the arterial lumen to provide radial support to the diseased vascular wall. The adoption of stenting into clinical practice was made possible by a crucial evolution in deployment . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Department of Cardiology and Joseph J. Jacobs Center for Thrombosis and Vascular Biology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Differences in Prognostic Factors and Outcomes Between Women and Men Undergoing Coronary Artery Stenting
Julinda Mehilli, Adnan Kastrati, Josef Dirschinger, Hildegard Bollwein, Franz-Josef Neumann, and Albert Schömig
JAMA. 2000;284(14):1799-1805.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Coronary Artery Stents
Jassim Al Suwaidi, Peter B. Berger, and David R. Holmes, Jr
JAMA. 2000;284(14):1828-1836.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Stent-Assisted Angioplasty of Symptomatic Intracranial Vertebrobasilar Artery Stenosis: Feasibility and Follow-up Results
Kim et al.
Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2005;26:1381-1388.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Apolipoprotein E gene polymorphisms and thrombosis and restenosis after coronary artery stenting
Koch et al.
J. Lipid Res. 2004;45:2221-2226.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Two Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors, Tirofiban and Abciximab, for the Prevention of Ischemic Events with Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization
Topol et al.
NEJM 2001;344:1888-1894.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.