This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: We noted a surprising result in Table 3 in the article by Dr Sherman and colleagues¹ discussing ancrod for management of acute ischemic stroke. Patients in the placebo group who presented before 3 hours had elapsed from the onset of stroke symptoms fared better than patients presenting later, whether the latter were given placebo or ancrod.

One possible interpretation is that the time lag between symptom onset and presentation to the hospital is actually an indirect marker for stroke severity. There is a known correlation between initial stroke severity and prognosis.² One might imagine that patients with severe impairment from a large stroke would present later, on average, either because they are more likely to be anosognosic or because they find it more difficult to summon help. However, there are no empirical data addressing this question. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) trial³ did . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive
Ali et al.
Stroke 2007;38:1905-1910.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recommendations for Advancing Development of Acute Stroke Therapies: Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable 3
Fisher
Stroke 2003;34:1539-1546.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT