You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 284 No. 15, October 18, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (11)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Movement Disorders
 •Parkinson Disease/ Parkinsonian Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Dopamine Agonists in Early Therapy for Parkinson Disease

Promise and Problems

Caroline M. Tanner, MD, PhD

JAMA. 2000;284:1971-1973.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The successful use of levodopa, the immediate precursor of dopamine, to reverse motor deficits in Parkinson disease (PD) revolutionized treatment.1 But for most patients with PD, the benefits of levodopa therapy have been tempered by adverse effects such as involuntary movements or hallucinations. These adverse effects occur in as many as 90% of patients receiving long-term treatment, although whether they are actually caused by levodopa treatment, or simply reflect progression of the underlying disease, is unknown.2

Some evidence suggests that levodopa may injure substantia nigra neurons.3-4 Thus, the patient with PD is thrust into an almost untenable therapeutic double bind—does effective short-term symptom relief cause permanent nerve cell loss and ultimately a more malignant disease course? As a result, patients with PD commonly are not treated with levodopa until motor disability interferes significantly with independent functioning. The emotional and economic costs of this treatment approach . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: Parkinson's Institute, Sunnyvale, Calif.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Pramipexole vs Levodopa as Initial Treatment for Parkinson Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Parkinson Study Group
JAMA. 2000;284(15):1931-1938.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Frontiers in Neuropharmacotherapy Part II: Multiple Sclerosis and Parkinson's Disease
Chappell and Cohen
Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2002;15:221-240.
ABSTRACT  

Initial bromocriptine did not change mortality in early, mild Parkinson's disease
Albanese
Evid. Based Med. 2002;7:91-91.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical trial end points: On the road to nowhere?
Holloway and Dick
Neurology 2002;58:679-686.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Daytime Sleepiness, Agonist Therapy, and Driving in Parkinson Disease
Comella
JAMA 2002;287:509-511.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.