You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 284 No. 2, July 12, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •HIV/AIDS
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Interleukin 2 Treatment for HIV Infection

Joel Blankson, MD, PhD; Robert F. Siliciano, MD, PhD

JAMA. 2000;284:236-238.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Approaches to the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection continue to evolve rapidly, raising complex medical and scientific questions. The advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), involving combinations of inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase and protease, has resulted in dramatic decreases in death rates from acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in the United States.1 In select patient populations participating in clinical trials of various HAART regimens, clearance of detectable virus from blood is observed in 70% to 90% of patients.2-4 Patients who respond to HAART show a surprising degree of reconstitution of the immune system.

Even though HAART represents a truly inspiring example of the success of rational drug design, there certainly are downsides associated with this therapeutic approach. In a typical urban clinic, response rates to HAART may be only 35% to 40%.5 An increasing number of . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Immunologic and Virologic Effects of Subcutaneous Interleukin 2 in Combination With Antiretroviral Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Richard T. Davey, Jr, Robert L. Murphy, Frank M. Graziano, Stephen L. Boswell, Andrew T. Pavia, Margarita Cancio, Jeffrey P. Nadler, Doreen G. Chaitt, Robin L. Dewar, David K. Sahner, Anne-Marie Duliege, William B. Capra, Wai-Ping Leong, Martin A. Giedlin, H. Clifford Lane, and James O. Kahn
JAMA. 2000;284(2):183-189.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Immune Restoration With Antiretroviral Therapies: Implications for Clinical Management
Michael M. Lederman and Hernan Valdez
JAMA. 2000;284(2):223-228.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

An anti-CD45RO immunotoxin kills HIV-latently infected cells from individuals on HAART with little effect on CD8 memory
Saavedra-Lozano et al.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004;101:2494-2499.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Role of Interleukin-2 in HIV Treatment
JWatch General 2000;2000:2-2.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.