You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 284 No. 21, December 6, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Back Belts in the Workplace

Nortin M. Hadler, MD; Timothy S. Carey, MD, MPH

JAMA. 2000;284:2780-2781.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In this issue of THE JOURNAL, Wassell and colleagues1 present the results of a prospective cohort study evaluating the potential benefits to workers who wear back belts when handling materials. They discern none. Not only of interest to workplace, health, and safety policymaker, the article offers lessons to those interested in regional backache. The science is noteworthy as is the social construct it serves. When regional backache thwarts physical performance, should the task(s) be viewed as hazardous and the worker injured?

In assessing the effectiveness of an intervention, cohort studies are often considered inferior to randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Therefore, since an RCT published in THE JOURNAL 2 years ago2 showed that wearing back belts for 6 months afforded no advantage to airline baggage handlers, why publish a cohort study? It is possible that workers who choose to wear belts may . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

A Prospective Study of Back Belts for Prevention of Back Pain and Injury
James T. Wassell, Lytt I. Gardner, Douglas P. Landsittel, Janet J. Johnston, and Janet M. Johnston
JAMA. 2000;284(21):2727-2732.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Do Back Belts Prevent Back Injury?
Dorinson et al.
JAMA 2001;285:1151-1152.
FULL TEXT  

Back Belts Ineffective for Prevention of Back Pain
JWatch General 2001;2001:7-7.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.