You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 284 No. 23, December 20, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Quality of Care at Teaching and Nonteaching Hospitals

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Allison and colleagues1 found that teaching hospitals have better processes of care and outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This is quite different from the results of our study2 of the same Cooperative Cardiovascular Project (CCP) data set. We found no independent association between teaching status and survival.

The 2 studies differ in several respects. Allison et al seem to exclude all 39 025 patients subsequently transferred to other hospitals, whom we assigned to the initial admitting hospital. The CCP hospitals without the ability to perform bypass surgery transferred 29.9% of patients, usually for angiography and revascularization. These patients had a 30-day mortality of 8.6%, which is half the rate of patients who were not transferred, and had higher compliance with process-of-care guidelines. Hospitals with high levels of technology transferred only 1.9% of their patients. Because availability of technology is strongly correlated with teaching status . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Should Consumers Trust Hospital Quality Report Cards?
Emily V. A. Finlayson, John D. Birkmeyer, David W. Baker, Randall D. Cebul, Kerry R. Hicks, Harlan M. Krumholz, Saif S. Rathore, and Jersey Chen
JAMA. 2002;287(24):3206-3208.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Relationship of Hospital Teaching Status With Quality of Care and Mortality for Medicare Patients With Acute MI
Jeroan J. Allison, Catarina I. Kiefe, Norman W. Weissman, Sharina D. Person, Matthew Rousculp, John G. Canto, Sejong Bae, O. Dale Williams, Robert Farmer, and Robert M. Centor
JAMA. 2000;284(10):1256-1262.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Variations in Quality of Care for Men With Early-Stage Prostate Cancer
Spencer et al.
JCO 2008;26:3735-3742.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do we need more doctors?
Bloor et al.
JRSM 2006;99:281-287.
FULL TEXT  

The effect of hospital type and surgical delay on mortality after surgery for hip fracture
Weller et al.
J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87-B:361-366.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Should Consumers Trust Hospital Quality Report Cards?
Finlayson et al.
JAMA 2002;287:3206-3208.
FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of a Consumer-Oriented Internet Health Care Report Card: The Risk of Quality Ratings Based on Mortality Data
Krumholz et al.
JAMA 2002;287:1277-1287.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.