 |
|
Non-English Reports of Medical Research
|
|
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
|
|
To the Editor: In their systematic review and meta-analysis, Drs Wu and Colford1 examined the role of chorioamnionitis as a risk factor for cerebral palsy and cystic periventricular leukomalacia (cPVL). They concluded that chorioamnionitis is a risk factor for both conditions, a finding with potentially important clinical and economic implications. The authors carefully examined potential sources of heterogeneity, which is of crucial importance in meta-analysis of observational studies.2 It is ironic, however, that they used sophisticated statistical methods to examine the possible presence of publication bias while completely ignoring an obvious source of reporting bias: a priori exclusion of studies published in languages other than English. An unknown number of relevant studies are thus missing from their review. This likely reduced the precision of their estimates and, more worrisome, may have introduced bias. For example, it has been shown that investigators based in German-speaking countries tend to publish clinical trials . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
A Clinical Practice Guideline for Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: A US Public Health Service Report
JAMA. ;283():3244-3254.
FULL TEXT
Chorioamnionitis as a Risk Factor for Cerebral Palsy: A Meta-analysis
and
JAMA. ;284():1417-1424.
FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Appraising Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Bigby and Williams
Arch Dermatol 2003;139:795-798.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Systematic reviews in epidemiology: why are we so far behind?
Dickersin
Int J Epidemiol 2002;31:6-12.
FULL TEXT
|
