 |
 |

Perspectives on the Fifth Revision of the Declaration of Helsinki
Povl Riis, MD, FRCP
JAMA. 2000;284:3045-3046.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
The first Declaration of Helsinki adopted by the World Medical Association in 1964 was one of the first attempts to transform reactions to the atrocities committed in the name of biomedical research during the Nazi period into preventive measures with a full global perspective. The second version, released in 1975, was rewritten from an observation point closer to active clinical science. The resulting impact on biomedical science was obvious within a few years. The requirement to establish research ethics committees made research ethics visible, not only among scientists but also in society at large.
At the same time, biomedical research expanded toward society in epidemiology and toward basic life processes in molecular biology. Further extension took place geographically with an increasing globalization of research results and multinational research projects.
Consequently, a thorough revision of the 1975 version has been necessary for some years, not to change . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Author Affiliation: Committee on Scientific Dishonesty, Ministry of Science, Copenhagen, Denmark. Dr Riis was 1 of the 3 Nordic authors involved in drafting the 1975 version of the Declaration of Helsinki.
RELATED ARTICLES
Helsinki Discord? A Controversial Declaration
Brian Vastag
JAMA. 2000;284(23):2983-2985.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
JAMA. 2000;284(23):3043-3045.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
The three official language versions of the Declaration of Helsinki: what's lost in translation?
Carlson et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2007;33:545-548.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Effectiveness of St John's Wort in Major Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Shelton et al.
JAMA 2001;285:1978-1986.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|