This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (3)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related articles  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Guyatt and colleagues¹ suggest a hierarchy of study design to evaluate the strength of evidence for making treatment decisions. In promoting the superiority of single randomized trials over systematic reviews of observational studies, the authors risk making the same mistake that evidence-based medicine professes to avoid—relying on personal experience and disregarding the best available evidence.

Randomized trials are not always the best way to evaluate treatment in a given clinical scenario, and poorly conducted randomized trials may lead to erroneous conclusions and produce contradictory results. Evidence suggests that observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can produce similar estimates of the effects of treatment,² and that meta-analyses of observational studies produce results that are similar to meta-analyses of randomized trials.³

Furthermore, current rigid hierarchy promoted by Guyatt et al will necessarily place less value on evidence that does not fit into a specific category.⁴ More precise . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XXV. Evidence-Based Medicine: Principles for Applying the Users' Guides to Patient Care
Gordon H. Guyatt, R. Brian Haynes, Roman Z. Jaeschke, Deborah J. Cook, Lee Green, C. David Naylor, Mark C. Wilson, W. Scott Richardson, and for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group
JAMA. 2000;284(10):1290-1296.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Randomized Trial of Estrogen Plus Progestin for Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease in Postmenopausal Women
Stephen Hulley, Deborah Grady, Trudy Bush, Curt Furberg, David Herrington, Betty Riggs, Eric Vittinghoff, and for the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study Research Group
JAMA. 1998;280(7):605-613.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Bridging The Inferential Gap: The Electronic Health Record And Clinical Evidence
Stewart et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:w181-w191.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Searching for Evidence-Based Medicine in the Literature Part 3: Assessment
Bartkowiak
Clin Med Res 2005;3:113-115.
FULL TEXT