You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 284 No. 9, September 6, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (19)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Education
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Academic Medicine's Financial Accountability and Responsibility

Uwe E. Reinhardt, PhD

JAMA. 2000;284:1136-1138.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In his recent review of Ludmerer's Time to Heal,1 Steven Schroeder, MD, concludes that Ludmerer's book "presents a powerful case that academic medicine's self-serving behavior has jeopardized its unique public trust."2 Remarkably, Schroeder, a distinguished medical educator and current president and chief executive officer of The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, does not take exception to this harsh indictment. One suspects that he may concur.

A permanent loss of public trust in academic medicine would be tragic. As Schroeder notes, "for most of the twentieth century academic medicine was the jewel in the crown of the US health care system."2 Most students of US health care, and certainly I, would agree. Fortunately, the past tense used in Schroeder's sentence may be premature. The many contributions of academic medicine are the reason that the US health care delivery system (as distinct from its health insurance system) is . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Review of US Medical School Finances, 1998-1999
Jack Y. Krakower, Tanya Y. Coble, Donna J. Williams, and Robert F. Jones
JAMA. 2000;284(9):1127-1129.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Trends in US Medical School Faculty Salaries, 1988-1989 to 1998-1999
Erich Studer-Ellis, Jennifer S. Gold, and Robert F. Jones
JAMA. 2000;284(9):1130-1135.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Political Economy Of U.S. Primary Care
Sandy et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28:1136-1145.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

American Medical Education 100 Years after the Flexner Report.
Cooke et al.
NEJM 2006;355:1339-1344.
FULL TEXT  

A New Series on Medical Education.
Cox and Irby
NEJM 2006;355:1375-1376.
FULL TEXT  

Raising the Passing Grade for Studies of Medical Education
Lurie
JAMA 2003;290:1210-1212.
FULL TEXT  

Academic Medicine: Boom to Bust
Friedenberg
Radiology 2001;220:296-298.
FULL TEXT  

Chopping Down the Groves of Academe
Van Way
Nutr Clin Pract 2001;16:137-138.
 

Impact on the New Chair
Trunkey
Arch Surg 2001;136:165-168.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

JAMA 2001 Medical Education Issue: A Call for Papers
Lurie
JAMA 2001;285:465-466.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.