You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 285 No. 12, March 28, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (15)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Trends in Screening for Colorectal Cancer—United States, 1997 and 1999

JAMA. 2001;285:1570-1571.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

MMWR. 2001;50:162-166

2 tables, 1 figure omitted

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States.1 An estimated 135,400 new cases and 56,700 deaths from colorectal cancer are expected during 2001.1 Since the mid-1990s, national guidelines have recommended that persons aged >=50 years at average risk for colorectal cancer should have screening tests regularly. To estimate rates for the use of colorectal cancer screening tests and to evaluate trends in test use, CDC analyzed data from the 1999 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) on the use of a home administered fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy, and then compared them with similar data from 1997. The findings in this report indicate that the proportion of the U.S. population that has been screened remains low. In 1999, 44% of BRFSS respondents reported receiving FOBT and/or sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy within the recommended period compared with approximately 41% . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population
Kuehle et al.
Gut 2007;56:1079-1085.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Use of Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review Prepared for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Dube et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2007;146:365-375.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors for Primary Prevention of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review Prepared for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Rostom et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2007;146:376-389.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Colorectal Adenomas: A Prototype for the Use of Surrogate End Points in the Development of Cancer Prevention Drugs
Kelloff et al.
Clin. Cancer Res. 2004;10:3908-3918.
FULL TEXT  

Colorectal Cancer Screening for Persons at Average Risk
Anderson et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:1126-1133.
FULL TEXT  

Detection of APC Mutations in Fecal DNA from Patients with Colorectal Tumors
Traverso et al.
NEJM 2002;346:311-320.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer: a perspective
Barry
Ann Oncol 2002;13:61-64.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.