You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 285 No. 14, April 11, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Association Between Changes in Hormone Replacement Therapy and Breast Density

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Rutter and colleagues1 studied the relationship between initiating, continuing, and discontinuing hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and mammographic breast density. They found that HRT may increase breast density for some but not all women and that increases in breast density may make mammograms more difficult to interpret.

But this study does not assess whether this difficulty translates into poorer prognosis or clinically missed cancers. Previous studies have shown that there is no effect of HRT on mammographic sensitivity or breast cancer detection.2-3 Others4 have found no significant differences in the numbers of mammographically detected cancers and false-negative mammograms between HRT users and nonusers.

It is well known that mammograms are less sensitive in younger women, whose breasts are typically more dense. As hormone levels decline after menopause, breast density decreases. For most women, HRT maintains the level of breast density at the time of initiation. Although HRT . . . [Full Text of this Article]


RELATED ARTICLE

Changes in Breast Density Associated With Initiation, Discontinuation, and Continuing Use of Hormone Replacement Therapy
Carolyn M. Rutter, Margaret T. Mandelson, Mary B. Laya, and Stephen Taplin
JAMA. 2001;285(2):171-176.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.