You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 285 No. 15, April 18, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (43)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

CONSORT Revised—Improving the Reporting of Randomized Trials

Drummond Rennie, MD

JAMA. 2001;285:2006-2007.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

If physicians are to base treatment decisions on the evidence in the medical literature, all the relevant results of trials must be available easily and consistently. Yet it is common to have trouble identifying the hypothesis, the research question, and the design of a published trial. It is even more common to lose count of the participants or to be unable to tell who received what therapies and the type of analysis used. As a result, it is often impossible to know whether the conclusions are justified by the data.

In February 1995, Schulz and colleagues1 published an important article that drew attention to this sad state of affairs and to the importance of complete reporting of clinical trials if bias was to be avoided. At that time 2 groups, responding to the widespread perception that reporting of study results was highly variable, had held meetings to . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: Dr Rennie is Deputy Editor, JAMA.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials
David Moher, Kenneth F. Schulz, Douglas Altman, and for the CONSORT Group
JAMA. 2001;285(15):1987-1991.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials: A Comparative Before-and-After Evaluation
David Moher, Alison Jones, Leah Lepage, and for the CONSORT Group
JAMA. 2001;285(15):1992-1995.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials
Matthias Egger, Peter Jüni, Christopher Bartlett, and for the CONSORT Group
JAMA. 2001;285(15):1996-1999.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physician Interpretations and Textbook Definitions of Blinding Terminology in Randomized Controlled Trials
P. J. Devereaux, Braden J. Manns, William A. Ghali, Hude Quan, Christina Lacchetti, Victor M. Montori, Mohit Bhandari, and Gordon H. Guyatt
JAMA. 2001;285(15):2000-2003.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Editorial: Journal of Pediatric Psychology Statement of Purpose Section on Randomized Trials
Wysocki
J Pediatr Psychol 2008;33:12-15.
FULL TEXT  

Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
Elm et al.
BMJ 2007;335:806-808.
FULL TEXT  

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies
von Elm et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2007;147:573-577.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reporting of randomized controlled trials in Hodgkin lymphoma in biomedical journals.
Kober et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:620-625.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Reporting of Observational Longitudinal Research
Tooth et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2005;161:280-288.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Influence of an Anterior-Posterior Gliding Mobile Bearing on Range of Motion After Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded Study
Aigner et al.
JBJS 2004;86:2257-2262.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Travelling but never arriving: reflections of a retiring editor
Smith
BMJ 2004;329:242-244.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical Trials--Multiple Treatments, Multiple End Points, and Multiple Lessons
Lauer and Topol
JAMA 2003;289:2575-2577.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical Trials in the Journal of Pediatric Psychology: Applying the CONSORT Statement
Stinson et al.
J Pediatr Psychol 2003;28:159-167.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reflections on Medical Journals
Moher et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2002;137:1011-1012.
FULL TEXT  

Smoke detectors and house fires
Pless
BMJ 2002;325:979-980.
FULL TEXT  

IX: Summary of Meta-Analyses of Therapies for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
Cranney et al.
Endocr. Rev. 2002;23:570-578.
FULL TEXT  

Reflections on Medical Journals: Has Progress Made Them Better?
Kassirer
ANN INTERN MED 2002;137:46-48.
FULL TEXT  

It's Acronymania All Over Again: With Due Reference to YB Yogi Berra
Baue
Arch Surg 2002;137:486-489.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.