You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 285 No. 18, May 9, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Contempo Updates: Linking Evidence and Experience
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Clinical Xenotransplantation

Louisa E. Chapman, MD; Eda T. Bloom, PhD

JAMA. 2001;285:2304-2306.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The remarkable half-century transition of whole organ transplantation from experimental intervention to standard clinical practice has resulted in a growing disparity between the number of persons who could potentially benefit from allotransplants and the availability of transplantable human organs.1 This disparity inspired initial attempts to explore alternative therapies for organ failure, among them xenotransplantation, which involves the use of living, nonhuman animal tissues in humans.

Prior to the last decade, the US clinical experience with xenotransplantation largely consisted of rare, whole organ transplants. Recipient survival after the xenograft was generally measured in days or weeks. Although animal studies and the early unregulated human trials have not demonstrated whole organ xenograft survival rates high enough to justify proceeding with clinical trials, active preclinical research on whole organ xenografting continues. More promising research also continues regarding the potential role of approaches other than whole . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Definitions

Author Affiliations: HIV/AIDS and Retrovirology Branch, Division of AIDS, STD and TB Laboratory Research, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Ga (Dr Chapman); Laboratory of Immunology and Virology, Division of Cellular and Gene Therapies, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, Md (Dr Bloom).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

May 9, 2001
JAMA. 2001;285(18):2393-2394.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Identification of receptors for pig endogenous retrovirus
Ericsson et al.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003;100:6759-6764.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.