You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 285 No. 21, June 6, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (22)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Screening
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Informed Choice in Cancer Screening

H. Gilbert Welch, MD,MPH

JAMA. 2001;285:2776-2778.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

I've always known shared decision making involves real work, but recently the challenge really hit home. A few days after I was invited to write this editorial, I visited my 80-year-old mother in Colorado. (Note: this is pure coincidence, both events are rare. . . . ) She had just learned that she had carotid artery stenosis. She was asymptomatic and was being asked to consider angiography and possibly surgery. Her physician and I wanted her to make an informed choice. She asked me to write the relevant information on a single sheet of paper, so she could read it, think about it, and read it again. I struggled with the assignment. The primary data source was clear: the ACAS (Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study)1 and the mortality rate observed in the real world.2

But there were a lot of questions dealing with the 1-page presentation. My . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Screening Tends to Miss the Most Aggressive Cancers

Author Affiliations: Department of Veterans Affairs, White River Junction, Vt, and Center for Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Cancer Screening in Elderly Patients: A Framework for Individualized Decision Making
Louise C. Walter and Kenneth E. Covinsky
JAMA. 2001;285(21):2750-2756.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Patient Expectations of Full-Body CT Screening
Kolber et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2007;188:W297-W304.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Randomized Clinical Trials for Cancer Screening: Rationale and Design Considerations for Imaging Tests
Black
JCO 2006;24:3252-3260.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Targeting screening mammography according to life expectancy among women undergoing dialysis.
Walter et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1203-1208.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Enthusiasm for Cancer Screening in the United States
Schwartz et al.
JAMA 2004;291:71-78.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is opportunistic disease prevention in the consultation ethically justifiable?
Getz et al.
BMJ 2003;327:498-500.
FULL TEXT  

Lung Cancer Screening with CT: Mayo Clinic Experience
Swensen et al.
Radiology 2003;226:756-761.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Liability for Failure to Order Screening Examinations
Berlin
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2002;179:1401-1405.
FULL TEXT  

CT Screening for Lung Cancer
Swensen
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2002;179:833-836.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.