You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 285 No. 3, January 17, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (8)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Health Policy
 •Medical Ethics
 •Transplantation
 •Transplantation, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Reexamining Organ Transplantation

Alexander M. Capron, LLB

JAMA. 2001;285:334-336.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

It is time to consider a fundamental reexamination of the US system for transplantable organ procurement and allocation. This need arises from several important issues, including whether regional vs national allocation policies best ensure fair access to available organs; the alleged problems in procurement of human tissue under investigation by the Inspector General of the US Department of Health and Human Services1-2; the application of new technologies for growing human pluripotent stem cells that may one day allow the manufacture of replacement organs and tissues autologous to their recipients; and perhaps most important, weaknesses and tensions in organ procurement policies that have produced chronic problems and shortfalls in the availability of life-saving solid organs. The article by Wendler and Dickert3 in this issue of THE JOURNAL is the latest indication of concerns about equity, reliability, and efficacy in organ procurement and transplantation that must stimulate . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: University of Southern California Law School, Los Angeles.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

The Consent Process for Cadaveric Organ Procurement: How Does It Work? How Can It Be Improved?
Dave Wendler and Neal Dickert
JAMA. 2001;285(3):329-333.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Closing the Organ Gap: A Reciprocity-Based Social Contract Approach
Siegal and Bonnie
J Law Med Ethics 2006;34:415-423.
 

Attitudes and Practices in Postmortem Organ Procurement
Ramalingam et al.
JAMA 2001;285:1958-1960.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.