You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 285 No. 4, January 24, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Cost-effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Frazier and colleagues1 estimate that providing patients aged 50 years and older at average risk for colorectal cancer with screening colonoscopy every 10 years will reduce colorectal cancer mortality by 64%. These results are similar to those reported by Sonnenberg et al.2 The standard evidence given in support of this dramatic mortality benefit, which is substantially greater than has been demonstrated for any screening test, is the National Polyp Study.3 This study was not a randomized trial of the effect of colonoscopy on colorectal cancer mortality but a cohort study of selected patients undergoing colonoscopy. Because the National Polyp Study was not a randomized trial, the comparability of the case and control groups (3 historical cohorts) is open to question. Furthermore, the study's end point was the incidence of colorectal cancer, not mortality. This would not matter if every incident cancer resulted in death, but that . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.