You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 285 No. 7, February 21, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Controversies
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Ethics
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

What Price Mice?

Estelle A. Fishbein, BA,LLB

JAMA. 2001;285:939-941.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Because they are dedicated to the elimination of the use of all animals in medical experiments regardless of the human cost, animal protectionist groups have moved vigorously to seek the assistance of the federal courts. Inspired by their taste of success in other areas, these groups are now attempting to make the use of mice, rats, and birds in biomedical research prohibitively expensive and extremely burdensome. This raises the distinct possibility that such research is in danger of experiencing the strangulation by red tape that is threatening medical research in the United Kingdom.1-3

The latest effort by animal protectionist groups is remarkably shrewd. In 1998 a recently established group calling itself the Alternatives Research and Development Foundation (ARDF), functioning under the umbrella of the American Anti-Vivisectionist Society, filed a petition for rulemaking with the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) asking that the USDA cancel the longtime . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: Ms Fishbein is Vice President and General Counsel, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Regulations Governing the Use of Laboratory Animals
John McArdle, Charles G. Smith, and Marjorie Cramer
JAMA. 2001;286(3):304-305.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Regulations for the Use of Laboratory Animals
Dan Glickman
JAMA. 2001;285(7):941.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

From "publish or perish" to "patent and prosper".
Schachman
J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:6889-6903.
FULL TEXT  

Regulations Governing the Use of Laboratory Animals
McArdle et al.
JAMA 2001;286:304-305.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.