You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 286 No. 16, October 24, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Gastroenterology
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Improving Care for Elderly Patients With Peptic Ulcer Disease

Should the Focus Be on Drugs or Bugs?

Javed Butler, MD, MPH; Reid Ness, MD, MPH; Theodore Speroff, PhD

JAMA. 2001;286:2023-2024.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In this issue of THE JOURNAL, Brock and colleagues1 report the results of their study assessing quality improvement in process of care, as recommended by evidence-based clinical guidelines,2-3 for elderly patients hospitalized for peptic ulcer disease (PUD). Data for this study were derived from a quality improvement project conducted by peer review organizations (PROs) in 5 states. Although these databases are not designed primarily to answer scientific questions, the data collection and analyses are conducted rigorously. These data sources have been used to study several important issues, including assessing health care quality,4 identifying opportunities for improvement,5 evaluating effectiveness of care for patients not typically studied in randomized clinical trials (RCTs),6 developing risk adjustment models,7 assessing quality improvement interventions,8 and performing traditional epidemiologic and clinical research.9-10 Data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (formerly the Health Care Financing . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Center for Health Services Research (Drs Butler, Ness, and Speroff) and Center for Clinical Improvement (Dr Speroff), Divisions of Cardiovascular Medicine (Dr Butler) and Gastroenterolgy (Dr Ness), and Departments of Medicine (Drs Butler, Ness, and Speroff) and Preventive Medicine (Dr Speroff), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, and Medical Service, Tennessee Valley Health Care System—Nashville Campus (Drs Butler, Ness, and Speroff), Nashville.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Process of Care and Outcomes for Elderly Patients Hospitalized With Peptic Ulcer Disease: Results From a Quality Improvement Project
Jane Brock, Angela Sauaia, Dennis Ahnen, William Marine, William Schluter, Beth R. Stevens, Jeanne D. Scinto, Herbert Karp, and Dale Bratzler
JAMA. 2001;286(16):1985-1993.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.