 |
 |

Exposure to Soy-Based Formula in Infancy
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: Dr Strom and colleagues1 found no differences in later pubertal maturation or growth between infants who had been fed soy-based vs milk-based formula. However, this does not prove that soy-based formulas are safe. In fact, the authors found that infants who had been given soy-based formula later used more asthma and allergy medications (P = .047 and .08 for female and male subjects, respectively). This important observation was not mentioned in the abstract, which stated that "[n]o statistically significant differences were observed . . . for more than 30 outcomes."1
This conclusion contradicts the findings of both human and animal studies. A retrospective epidemiological study by Fort et al2 found that children with autoimmune disease were significantly more likely to have received soy formula as infants than were healthy siblings or control subjects. A recent study from the National Toxicology Program found that rats receiving dietary . . . [Full Text of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Exposure to Soy-Based Formula in Infancy and Endocrinological and Reproductive Outcomes in Young Adulthood
Brian L. Strom, Rita Schinnar, Ekhard E. Ziegler, Kurt T. Barnhart, Mary D. Sammel, George A. Macones, Virginia A. Stallings, Jean M. Drulis, Steven E. Nelson, and Sandra A. Hanson
JAMA. 2001;286(7):807-814.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Infant feeding with soy formula milk: effects on puberty progression, reproductive function and testicular cell numbers in marmoset monkeys in adulthood
Tan et al.
Hum Reprod 2006;21:896-904.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Adverse Effects on Female Development and Reproduction in CD-1 Mice Following Neonatal Exposure to the Phytoestrogen Genistein at Environmentally Relevant Doses
Jefferson et al.
Biol. Reprod. 2005;73:798-806.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|