You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 286 No. 22, December 12, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (20)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Rheumatology
 •Osteoporosis
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Osteoporosis, an Underdiagnosed Disease

Charles H. Chesnut III, MD

JAMA. 2001;286:2865-2866.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA), the largest study of osteoporosis conducted to date in the United States, have been eagerly awaited by osteoporosis researchers and clinicians. NORA, which commenced in 1997, is a longitudinal observational study involving more than 200 000 postmenopausal women. The study was initially designed to assess the association between osteoporosis risk factors and low bone mineral density (BMD) and to examine the relationship between BMD and other risk factors and short-term (1-year) fracture incidence.1

In this issue of THE JOURNAL, Siris et al2 report the study's initial findings of an unexpectedly high prevalence of unsuspected osteopenia and osteoporosis (as determined by BMD) among generally healthy postmenopausal women followed up in primary care practices. The study also confirms the utility of measurement of BMD at peripheral bone sites using several devices to predict short-term fracture risk. The importance of . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: Osteoporosis Research Center, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Identification and Fracture Outcomes of Undiagnosed Low Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women: Results From the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment
Ethel S. Siris, Paul D. Miller, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, Kenneth G. Faulkner, Lois E. Wehren, Thomas A. Abbott, Marc L. Berger, Arthur C. Santora, and Louis M. Sherwood
JAMA. 2001;286(22):2815-2822.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Aging alters the skeletal response to disuse in the rat
Perrien et al.
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2007;292:R988-R996.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

National Trends in Osteoporosis Visits and Osteoporosis Treatment, 1988-2003
Stafford et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1525-1530.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Care of Common Endocrine Problems in Cuba
Olson and Dickey
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004;89:1993-1997.
FULL TEXT  

Low Peripheral Bone-Density Measurements Predict Fractures
JWatch Gastroenterology 2002;2002:13-13.
FULL TEXT  

Low Peripheral Bone-Density Measurements Predict Fractures
JWatch General 2002;2002:1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.