You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 286 No. 23, December 19, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (18)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Primary Care/ Family Medicine
 •Psychiatry
 •Depression
 •Adverse Effects
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Choosing a First-Line Antidepressant

Equal on Average Does Not Mean Equal for Everyone

Gregory Simon, MD,MPH

JAMA. 2001;286:3003-3004.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Patients, physicians, health insurers, and pharmaceutical manufacturers all have a considerable interest in the initial selection of an antidepressant drug. Patients and physicians hope to minimize the trial and error needed to find the treatment with the greatest benefit and the fewest risks or adverse effects. Health insurers hope to satisfy patients and insurance purchasers while minimizing drug acquisition costs. Manufacturers hope to demonstrate a unique advantage for a specific drug, either for all patients or specific subgroups of patients. Such an advantage would reduce the need to compete based on lowest price.

The study by Kroenke et al1 in this issue of THE JOURNAL compared the effectiveness of the 3 most commonly prescribed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants (fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline) among primary care patients initiating antidepressant treatment. In designing this randomized trial, the investigators attempted to replicate the conditions of everyday practice. Participating . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, Wash.


RELATED ARTICLE

Similar Effectiveness of Paroxetine, Fluoxetine, and Sertraline in Primary Care: A Randomized Trial
Kurt Kroenke, Suzanne L. West, Ralph Swindle, Alicia Gilsenan, George J. Eckert, Rowena Dolor, Paul Stang, Xiao-Hua Zhou, Ron Hays, and Morris Weinberger
JAMA. 2001;286(23):2947-2955.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Generic Fluoxetine and Choice of Antidepressant Medication
Sernyak and Rosenheck
Psychiatr. Serv. 2007;58:128-130.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prices, profits, and innovation: examining criticisms of new psychotropic drugs' value.
Huskamp
Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25:635-646.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mental health in the medicare part d drug benefit: a new regulatory model?
Donohue
Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25:707-719.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Association of Utilization Management and Treatment Plan Modifications Among Practicing U.S. Psychiatrists
Mintz et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2004;161:1103-1109.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Managed Care: Improving Psychiatric Drug Benefit Management: II. Kaiser Permanente's Approach to SSRIs
Sabin and Daniels
Psychiatr. Serv. 2003;54:1343-1349.
FULL TEXT  

Managing Psychotropic Drug Costs: Will Formularies Work?
Huskamp
Health Aff (Millwood) 2003;22:84-96.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Three SSRIs Are Equally Effective
JWatch Psychiatry 2002;2002:8-8.
FULL TEXT  

Three SSRIs Are Equally Effective
JWatch General 2002;2002:1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.