 |
 |

Salmeterol and Inhaled Corticosteroids in Patients With Persistent Asthma
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: In their study comparing the efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids (ICs), salmeterol monotherapy, and placebo,1 Dr Lazarus and colleagues concluded that it is probably unsafe to switch patients with moderate persistent asthma from ICs to monotherapy with salmeterol. Some patients received placebo, and all patients received a placebo during a 6-week run-out period at the end of the study. Although the study protocol was approved by a federal protocol review committee and the institutional review boards at each of the clinical sites, the report did not fully address several complex and controversial ethical issues in the study design.
The authors did not address whether there was clinical equipoise2 between the safety or efficacy of either of these agents compared with placebo. If no equipoise exists between the study arms, then we question whether it was justifiable to expose the placebo group to the risks of undertreatment, and all . . . [Full Text of this Article]
RELATED ARTICLE
Long-Acting 2-Agonist Monotherapy vs Continued Therapy With Inhaled Corticosteroids in Patients With Persistent Asthma: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stephen C. Lazarus, Homer A. Boushey, John V. Fahy, Vernon M. Chinchilli, Robert F. Lemanske, Jr, Christine A. Sorkness, Monica Kraft, James E. Fish, Stephen P. Peters, Timothy Craig, Jeffrey M. Drazen, Jean G. Ford, Elliot Israel, Richard J. Martin, Elizabeth A. Mauger, Sami A. Nachman, Joseph D. Spahn, Stanley J. Szefler, and for the Asthma Clinical Research Network of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
JAMA. 2001;285(20):2583-2593.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Ethical Issues Confronted In Pulmonary Clinical Trials
Wise
Proc Am Thorac Soc 2007;4:200-205.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|