You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 286 No. 8, August 22, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Quick Uptakes
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Effective Screening for Inmate TB

Mike Mitka

JAMA. 2001;286:909.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The most cost-effective, efficient, and successful method of identifying active tuberculosis (TB) cases in jails is using miniature chest radiography, report researchers at the Tennessee Department of Health. The findings appear in the first of two July issues of the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.

The researchers estimated the cost of screening to detect an active TB case by miniature chest radiography at $9600. This compares with $32 100 per case identified by tuberculin skin testing and $54 100 per case by symptom screening.

Most jails and prisons perform tuberculin skin testing to detect active TB cases, but the method is neither sensitive nor specific enough to detect active disease, the researchers said. In the Memphis, jail, a program that screened inmates on admission using the skin test resulted in only a 5.8% rate of successfully read tests.

Another problem is inmate mobility. In Cook County, Illinois, . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Why Not Start With Thalidomide?
Loprinzi and Rajkumar
JCO 2003;21:2211-2214.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.