You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 287 No. 12, March 27, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Medical News & Perspectives
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Bioterrorism
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Despite Finding Anthrax Vaccine Useful, IOM Recommends Seeking a Better One

Brian Vastag

JAMA. 2002;287:1516-1517.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Washington—The nation's only anthrax vaccine, mandatory for most military personnel since 1998, is as safe as any other vaccine and will prevent infection from inhaled spores, concludes an extensive report issued by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) early this month. However, the report committee made it clear that the vaccine should be given only to those at high risk for exposure. Last fall's anthrax attacks left some physicians in a quandary when panicked patients demanded the vaccine.

These main conclusions were darkened by the report committee's concern about the vaccine's inadequacies, including an 18-month immunization schedule, painful subcutaneous delivery, and outdated design. Manufactured by Bioport Corp, Lansing, Mich, the vaccine was developed in the 1950s at Camp Detrick (now Fort Detrick), Maryland, which at the time housed a biological weapons program.

While fears of attacks from similar weapons prompted the military to adopt the vaccine, the injections . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Cost-Effectiveness of Strategies to Reduce Mortality from an Intentional Release of Aerosolized Anthrax Spores
Braithwaite et al.
Med Decis Making 2006;26:182-193.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.