 |
 |

Despite Finding Anthrax Vaccine Useful, IOM Recommends Seeking a Better One
Brian Vastag
JAMA. 2002;287:1516-1517.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
WashingtonThe nation's only anthrax vaccine, mandatory for most military personnel since 1998, is as safe as any other vaccine and will prevent infection from inhaled spores, concludes an extensive report issued by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) early this month. However, the report committee made it clear that the vaccine should be given only to those at high risk for exposure. Last fall's anthrax attacks left some physicians in a quandary when panicked patients demanded the vaccine.
These main conclusions were darkened by the report committee's concern about the vaccine's inadequacies, including an 18-month immunization schedule, painful subcutaneous delivery, and outdated design. Manufactured by Bioport Corp, Lansing, Mich, the vaccine was developed in the 1950s at Camp Detrick (now Fort Detrick), Maryland, which at the time housed a biological weapons program.
While fears of attacks from similar weapons prompted the military to adopt the vaccine, the injections . . . [Full Text of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
The Cost-Effectiveness of Strategies to Reduce Mortality from an Intentional Release of Aerosolized Anthrax Spores
Braithwaite et al.
Med Decis Making 2006;26:182-193.
ABSTRACT
|