 |
|
Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication
Drummond Rennie, MD
JAMA. 2002;287:2759-2760.
|
|
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
|
|
In this issue of THE JOURNAL, we publish articles selected from those manuscripts submitted to JAMA following presentation at the Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication, held in Barcelona, Spain, September 14 to 16, 2001.
On what was, in Spain, the afternoon of September 11, those of us from JAMA, who had arrived in Barcelona a few days early to make final preparations for the Congress, sat in our hotel rooms, staring with horror at images of the collapse of the World Trade Center towers and the devastation at the Pentagon.
Although our careful planning would probably go for naught, it was obvious, since terrorism works best when it most disrupts, that the Congress had to proceed. Yet it soon became apparent that all those from the Americas who were not already in Europe would be at best delayed, and, as events proved, . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Author Affiliations: Dr Rennie is Deputy Editor, JAMA, Chicago, Ill.
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Sixth International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication, September 2009: Call for Research
Rennie et al.
JAMA 2007;298:2420-2421.
FULL TEXT
At the frontier of biomedical publication: Chicago 2005
Fister
BMJ 2005;331:838-840.
FULL TEXT
Regulatory Parallels to Daubert: Stakeholder Influence, "Sound Science," and the Delayed Adoption of Health-Protective Standards
Neff and Goldman
Am. J. Public Health 2005;95:S81-S91.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Travelling but never arriving: reflections of a retiring editor
Smith
BMJ 2004;329:242-244.
FULL TEXT
Prior convictions: bayesian approaches to the analysis and interpretation of clinical megatrials
Diamond and Kaul
J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:1929-1939.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
A gift from anonymous
Edmunds
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2004;77:10-11.
FULL TEXT
The Fallacy of Double-Blinded Peer Review
Liebeskind et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2003;181
:1422-1423.
FULL TEXT
Our editorial process - some experiences and reflections
Emmelin and Wall
Scand J Public Health 2003;31:161-168.
Fifth International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication: Call for Research
Rennie et al.
JAMA 2003;289:1438-1438.
FULL TEXT
Fifth international congress on peer review and biomedical publication
Rennie et al.
BMJ 2003;326:563-564.
FULL TEXT
The RSNA Editorial Fellowship: Editorial Fellows' Perspective
Katz et al.
Radiology 2003;226:309-311.
FULL TEXT
How I Review an Original Scientific Article
Hoppin
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002;166:1019-1023.
FULL TEXT
The Peer Review Process (aka Peer Reviewology)
Yucha
Biol Res Nurs 2002;4:71-72.
|
