You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 287 No. 3, January 16, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  The Cover
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Humanities
 •Humanities, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Time

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.


Not Available Not Available Time, early 16th century, French or Flemish. Tapestry weave, silk and wool. 338.9 x 439.1 cm. Courtesy of The Cleveland Museum of Art, Cleveland, Ohio (http://www.clevelandart.org); Leonard C. Hanna Jr Fund.

During the Middle Ages, time, as now, was a major preoccupation. On the other hand, the concept of time, as well as its measurement, was vastly different. We think in split seconds, they thought in centuries, even millennia. As the French medievalist Jacques Le Goff has so elegantly described it, there was church time, merchant time, and work time; each had its own measure and meaning. Religious feasts, for example, were moveable, the exact time of their celebration determined by a phase of the moon; accurate, predictive calendars were essential, since the dates for observance were set by law. For merchants, time had a quantitative element, and calendars, at least daily calendars, . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.