You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 287 No. 3, January 16, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Revised ACIP Recommendation for Avoiding Pregnancy After Receiving a Rubella-Containing Vaccine

JAMA. 2002;287:311-312.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

MMWR. 2001;50:1117

On October 18, 2001, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) reviewed data from several sources indicating that no cases of congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) had been identified among infants born to women who were vaccinated inadvertently against rubella within 3 months or early in pregnancy. On the basis of these data, ACIP shortened its recommended period to avoid pregnancy after receipt of rubella-containing vaccine from 3 months to 28 days.

Data were available from the U.S. Rubella Vaccine in Pregnancy Registry,1 the U.K. National Congenital Rubella Surveillance Programme (National Congenital Registry Surveillance Programme, unpublished data, 2001; P. Tookey, Ph.D., Center of Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Child Health, London, personal communication, April 2001), and Sweden and Germany (G. Enders, M.D., Laboratory of Enders and Partners, and Institute for Virology, Infectology, and Epidemiology, personal communication, September 2001) on 680 live births to susceptible women who were inadvertently . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Mechanism of Action at the Molecular Level of the Antiviral Drug 3(2H)-Isoflavene against Type 2 Poliovirus
Salvati et al.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004;48:2233-2243.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Characterization of a Highly Evolved Vaccine-Derived Poliovirus Type 3 Isolated from Sewage in Estonia
Blomqvist et al.
J. Virol. 2004;78:4876-4883.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nucleotide variation in Sabin type 2 poliovirus from an immunodeficient patient with poliomyelitis
Buttinelli et al.
J. Gen. Virol. 2003;84:1215-1221.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.