This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related articles  • Similar articles in JAMA

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Welch and colleagues¹ reported that patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with initially normal or nonspecific initial electrocardiogram (ECG) results had lower mortality rates than those who presented with diagnostic ECG results. These conclusions are based on odds ratios derived from models comparing mortality in patients with normal or nonspecific ECG results and in patients with ECG signs specific to AMI. Although odds ratios are important measures of association, they do not describe the ability of information—here normal, nonspecific, or specific ECG results—to help the clinician predict the death or survival of a given patient.² To provide this information, the authors should have focused on the positive and negative predictive values.³ The relevant positive predictive value is the proportion of patients dying in the diagnostic ECG group (11.5%); the relevant negative predictive values would be the proportions of patients surviving in the normal (94.3%) and the . . . [Full Text of this Article]

RELATED ARTICLES

Prognostic Value of a Normal or Nonspecific Initial Electrocardiogram in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Robert D. Welch, Robert J. Zalenski, Paul D. Frederick, Judith A. Malmgren, Scott Compton, Mary Grzybowski, Sophia Thomas, Terry Kowalenko, Nathan R. Every, and for the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 and 3 Investigators
JAMA. 2001;286(16):1977-1984.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prognostic Indices in Clinical Practice
Donald A. Redelmeier and Andrew J. Lustig
JAMA. 2001;285(23):3024-3025.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT