You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 287 No. 7, February 20, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Journalology/ Peer Review/ Authorship
 •Alert me on articles by topic

To JAMA Authors and Peer Reviewers—Thank You

Catherine D. DeAngelis, MD,MPH; Phil B. Fontanarosa, MD

JAMA. 2002;287:900.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The major purpose of THE JOURNAL is to publish the most important and highest-quality articles possible on a wide range of topics in medicine, with evaluation based on prompt editorial assessment and rigorous peer review. By doing so, we hope that articles in JAMA advance medical science, expand medical knowledge, and, ultimately, help physicians provide the most up-to-date and scientifically based care for patients.1 Accomplishing this is possible only with the active involvement and essential contributions of 2 important scientific constituencies—authors and peer reviewers—to whom we extend our sincere gratitude.

The importance, quality, and impact of a scientific journal are direct reflections of the work authors submit to it. On behalf of the editorial staff of THE JOURNAL, we extend our sincere appreciation to the medical researchers, clinical investigators, physicians, and other authors who submit their papers for consideration for publication. In . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Dr DeAngelis is Editor and Dr Fontanarosa is Executive Deputy Editor, JAMA.


RELATED ARTICLE

The JAMA Peer Review Report for 2001
Elaine S. Williams
JAMA. 2002;287(7):901-914.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.