You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 287 No. 9, March 6, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Breastfeeding vs Formula-Feeding Among HIV-Infected Women in Resource-Poor Areas

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In their study of breastfeeding vs formula-feeding among women with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in Nairobi, Kenya, Dr Mbori-Ngacha and colleagues1 found no significant difference in 2-year infant mortality rates. However, I have several concerns about the results of their study, which shows that breastfed infants were more likely to experience the combined end point of death or HIV infection at 2 years.

First, the study's determination of infant HIV-1 status by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay does not account for the test's capability, which is to look for antibodies rather than the virus itself. Infants in the breastfeeding group might have had high levels due to transmission of the mother's antibodies through breastmilk.

Second, a large number of women in this trial used both breastfeeding and formula feeding. In this study, mixed feeders were assigned to the breastfeeding group, thus creating a substantial bias against success . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.