You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 288 No. 1, July 3, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  JAMA 100 Years Ago
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

July 5, 1902
THE LESSENED BIRTH RATE.

JAMA. 2002;288:18.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In view of the alarmist tendency of one or two recently published papers on the falling birth rate, it is perhaps worth while to look at another aspect of the question. To some extent this has already been done in the editorial columns of THE JOURNAL; attention has been called to the unreliability of the data on which much of the pessimistic deduction has been made and to the fact that a falling birth rate and death rate were both accompaniments of thrift and easy circumstances in a population. Dr. A. L. Benedict in a recent article1 handles the subject elaborately. He shows that a diminished birth rate depends on many factors and not all of them, or those most efficient, are necessarily immoral or objectionable. The advance in the age of matrimony during the past century is alone effective, he holds, in reducing the birth rate nearly 50 per . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.