You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 288 No. 14, October 9, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Contempo Updates: Linking Evidence and Experience
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (37)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Tobacco
 •Alert me on articles by topic

CLINICIAN'S CORNER
Effective Tobacco Dependence Treatment

Michael C. Fiore, MD,MPH; Dorothy K. Hatsukami, PhD; Timothy B. Baker, PhD

JAMA. 2002;288:1768-1771.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

INTRODUCTION

More than at any time in the past, clinicians, public health professionals, and policy makers now possess sufficient evidence to implement effective tobacco dependence treatment programs and policies. We review key findings of great relevance to treating tobacco dependence: clinical, health system, and community interventions can each independently foster tobacco cessation.1-2 A transdisciplinary approach that incorporates all of these components holds the greatest promise for reducing population-based rates of tobacco use. If these interventions are implemented broadly, a larger proportion of the 46 million US adult smokers will try to quit. Among those who do try, the likelihood of successful cessation will increase substantially.


Epidemiology

In 1999, the proportion of US adults who had successfully quit (45.7 million [23.1%]) approached that of individuals who continued to smoke (46.5 million [23.5%]).3 This statistical equivalence highlights the progress achieved . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Economic Benefits

Clinical Approaches

Health System Approaches

Community-Level Interventions

Conclusions

Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine (Dr Fiore) and Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention (Drs Fiore and Baker), University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison; Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Madison (Dr Baker); and Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Dr Hatsukami).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Clinician-Patient Communication About Physical Activity in an Underserved Population
Carroll et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2008;21:118-127.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Future of Tobacco-Control Research
Morgan et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:1077-1080.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Integrating smoking cessation into mental health care for post-traumatic stress disorder
McFall et al.
Clin Trials 2007;4:178-189.
ABSTRACT  

Drugs to support smoking cessation in UK general practice: are evidence based guidelines being followed?
Wilson et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:284-288.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy: use or avoid?
Coleman
The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health 2005;125:210-211.
 

Improving the Rates of Quitting Smoking for Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
McFall et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2005;162:1311-1319.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy
Coleman et al.
BMJ 2004;328:965-966.
FULL TEXT  

Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure in Pediatric Asthma: Overview and Recommendations for Practice
Mcquaid et al.
CLIN PEDIATR 2003;42:775-787.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.