You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 288 No. 20, November 27, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine
 •Adult Critical Care
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Protocols to Improve the Care of Critically Ill Pediatric and Adult Patients

Maureen O. Meade, MD, MSc, FRCPC; E. Wesley Ely, MD, MPH, FCCP

JAMA. 2002;288:2601-2603.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In addition to the celebrated technological and pharmaceutical advances in intensive care, an unassuming type of research testing the use of protocols in care has yielded some of the most important improvements in patient mortality and morbidity, and in the costs of critical illness. The basic concept is that routine clinical care is enhanced when interdisciplinary teams of health professionals use evidence-based protocols to complement their clinical judgment.1 Perhaps the greatest value obtained from the use of protocols is that of reducing unnecessary variations in intensive care practice. Positive randomized trials now support the role of protocols for critical care interventions such as lung-protective ventilation,2 weaning from mechanical ventilation,3-8 transfusion of blood products,9 sepsis resuscitation,10 glycemic control,11 and sedation and analgesia.12-13

The benefit of protocols has been shown most consistently in approaches for weaning from mechanical ventilation. A . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario (Dr Meade); Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Center for Health Services Research of Vanderbilt University, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Nashville, Tenn (Dr Ely).


RELATED ARTICLE

Effect of Mechanical Ventilator Weaning Protocols on Respiratory Outcomes in Infants and Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Adrienne G. Randolph, David Wypij, Shekhar T. Venkataraman, James H. Hanson, Rainer G. Gedeit, Kathleen L. Meert, Peter M. Luckett, Peter Forbes, Michelle Lilley, John Thompson, Ira M. Cheifetz, Patricia Hibberd, Randall Wetzel, Peter N. Cox, John H. Arnold, and for the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators Network
JAMA. 2002;288(20):2561-2568.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Intensive Insulin Therapy in Critical Care: A review of 12 protocols
Wilson et al.
Diabetes Care 2007;30:1005-1011.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Albumin for fluid resuscitation: Implications of the Saline Versus Albumin Fluid Evaluation
Devlin and Barletta
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2005;62:637-642.
FULL TEXT  

Protocol-Driven Ventilator Management in Children: Comparison to Nonprotocol Care
Restrepo et al.
J Intensive Care Med 2004;19:274-284.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.