You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 288 No. 8, August 28, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Educating Authors and Reviewers of Economic Evaluations of Health Care

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Jefferson and colleagues1 report that many economic evaluations of health care have serious methodological flaws, and that these have not improved over time. This is particularly disappointing because many of the current methodological standards were established 2 decades ago. Thus, the article by Jefferson et al is unlikely to improve the acceptance of such studies. Many physicians view health economic studies with skepticism2 and now may find further reason for their reservation.

The problem may even be worse than Jefferson et al indicate, however, because the checklists used in systematic reviews on health economic studies may not capture important methodological deficiencies. Checklists only reflect the quality of the data used to derive a cost-effectiveness ratio, but not the way the data are combined. Furthermore, they do not address more recent methodological advancements, which have not been widely adopted.3

Authors and peer reviewers must be better educated . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Quality of Systematic Reviews of Economic Evaluations in Health Care
Tom Jefferson, Vittorio Demicheli, and Luke Vale
JAMA. 2002;287(21):2809-2812.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Formal Continuing Medical Education: Do Conferences, Workshops, Rounds, and Other Traditional Continuing Education Activities Change Physician Behavior or Health Care Outcomes?
Dave Davis, Mary Ann Thomson O'Brien, Nick Freemantle, Fredric M. Wolf, Paul Mazmanian, and Anne Taylor-Vaisey
JAMA. 1999;282(9):867-874.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.