You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 288 No. 9, September 4, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Variability in Deans' Letters

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: The dean's letter is important to residency programs in assessing an applicant's performance during medical school. In 1989, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) issued guidelines recommending a uniform format for all deans' letters.1 The guidelines suggested the inclusion of a bottom-line statement of comparative performance, such as class rank or descriptive words, along with a key for interpreting such statements. However, controversy persists over the honesty2 and variability3-4 of deans' letters.

Methods

I reviewed of all deans' letters received by a large pediatric residency program between 1998 and 2001. Using a standardized data abstraction instrument, the letters were assessed for the presence or absence of a summary statement on comparative performance and a key for interpreting the summary statement.


Results
I reviewed 1130 deans' letters from 116 (91%) of 128 US allopathic medical schools. Overall, 70% of schools provided a bottom line summary of comparative performance. . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

How an educational improvement project improved the summative evaluation of medical students
Hoffman et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2009;18:283-287.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.